WOW they really want to make it into the next stablecraigevil wrote:For those running KDE, the qt-kde repo now has KDE 4.8.3
Lots of shiny new KDE upgrades.
2012-05-14
Main KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.8.3 packages are now available from these mirrors. Check this announcement mailfor further information.
As usual, do not file bugs in the official Debian BTS. Instead use the debian-kde mailing list or the #debian-kde IRC channel on irc.debian.org.
LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) -{CLOSED}
Forum rules
LMDE 2 has reached end of support as of 1-1-2019
LMDE 2 has reached end of support as of 1-1-2019
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
SID-Mate (no Shell/Cinnamon)
Gave up with standard Mint apt pinning
no longer tenable in SID. (Held on as long as I could)
(could delete altogether, I suppose, as they are all the same.)
Now
Was able to be a full DU with nothing held.
Able to re-install previously deleted packages.
(Gimp, Totem, LibreOffice)
Font quality suffered in Chrome browser, fine everywhere else.
This begs the question as to whether Clem will keep patching Ubuntu font packages for LMDE, or not. Only time will tell, I guess.
Gave up with standard Mint apt pinning
no longer tenable in SID. (Held on as long as I could)
(could delete altogether, I suppose, as they are all the same.)
Now
Code: Select all
Package: *
Pin: release o=linuxmint
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: origin packages.linuxmint.com
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: origin packages.mate-desktop.org
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority: 700
Was able to be a full DU with nothing held.
Able to re-install previously deleted packages.
(Gimp, Totem, LibreOffice)
Font quality suffered in Chrome browser, fine everywhere else.
Code: Select all
Commit Log for Wed May 16 15:23:54 2012
Upgraded the following packages:
fontconfig (2.8.0-2.1ubuntu3) to 2.9.0-5
fontconfig-config (2.8.0-2.1ubuntu3) to 2.9.0-5
libcairo-gobject2 (1.10.2-2ubuntu2) to 1.12.2-1
libfontconfig1 (2.8.0-2.1ubuntu3) to 2.9.0-5
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
libcairo2 in Debian testing and sid, fixed whatever the font issues where. If you want the Ubuntu fonts you can easily download and install them.
http://font.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu- ... y-0.80.zip
Personally I have never had any issues with the way my fonts look. Never understood what the big fuss was about.
my font.conf which has been the same since I started using Debian eight years ago.
http://font.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu- ... y-0.80.zip
Personally I have never had any issues with the way my fonts look. Never understood what the big fuss was about.
my font.conf which has been the same since I started using Debian eight years ago.
Code: Select all
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'>
<fontconfig>
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="rgba">
<const>none</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle">
<const>hintmedium</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<dir>~/.fonts</dir>
</fontconfig>
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
there's an app for thatGeneC wrote:SID-Mate (no Shell/Cinnamon)
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
I've been holding off for a while on upgrading syslinux and syslinux-common because of the following returned from apt-listbugs. I'm not really sure if this would affect me or not but it looks serious if it does. Any input?
Code: Select all
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
grave bugs of syslinux-common (2:4.05+dfsg-2 -> 2:4.05+dfsg-3) <unfixed>
#672520 - syslinux-common: spins on boot, never shows the boot menu
Summary:
syslinux-common(1 bug)
Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
Why do you need syslinux?cooleric1234 wrote:I've been holding off for a while on upgrading syslinux and syslinux-common because of the following returned from apt-listbugs. I'm not really sure if this would affect me or not but it looks serious if it does. Any input?
Code: Select all
Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done grave bugs of syslinux-common (2:4.05+dfsg-2 -> 2:4.05+dfsg-3) <unfixed> #672520 - syslinux-common: spins on boot, never shows the boot menu Summary: syslinux-common(1 bug) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
What? You mean I should actually think about what I'm upgrading? To be honest, I'm not sure. There are a lot of packages that I don't know by name if I need them or not, for some reason this one was just installed at some point and I figured I needed it. Looking at what it does that doesn't appear to be the case though, I can't see why I would need it. Thanks, I'll remove it.craigevil wrote:Why do you need syslinux?cooleric1234 wrote:I've been holding off for a while on upgrading syslinux and syslinux-common because of the following returned from apt-listbugs. I'm not really sure if this would affect me or not but it looks serious if it does. Any input?
Code: Select all
Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done grave bugs of syslinux-common (2:4.05+dfsg-2 -> 2:4.05+dfsg-3) <unfixed> #672520 - syslinux-common: spins on boot, never shows the boot menu Summary: syslinux-common(1 bug) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
To fix Chrome fonts using Debian packages
Read post by el-koraco three down from top
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? ... 30#p400290
Just substitute sudo for su -c
Read whole forum if you want, it is not that long.
Worked for me.
Read post by el-koraco three down from top
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? ... 30#p400290
Just substitute sudo for su -c
Read whole forum if you want, it is not that long.
Worked for me.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
cooleric1234 wrote:What? You mean I should actually think about what I'm upgrading? To be honest, I'm not sure. There are a lot of packages that I don't know by name if I need them or not, for some reason this one was just installed at some point and I figured I needed it. Looking at what it does that doesn't appear to be the case though, I can't see why I would need it. Thanks, I'll remove it.craigevil wrote:Why do you need syslinux?cooleric1234 wrote:I've been holding off for a while on upgrading syslinux and syslinux-common because of the following returned from apt-listbugs. I'm not really sure if this would affect me or not but it looks serious if it does. Any input?
Code: Select all
Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done grave bugs of syslinux-common (2:4.05+dfsg-2 -> 2:4.05+dfsg-3) <unfixed> #672520 - syslinux-common: spins on boot, never shows the boot menu Summary: syslinux-common(1 bug) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
cooleric,
I saw the same syslinux.common bug,
Went ahead to just d.u. on my Debian Gnome Sid with kde-plasma, since feb2011
and still survive.
EDIT, then I remember unetbootin..
so I delete unetbootin, syslinux..
and reinstall unetbootin, confirm syslinux is pull in by unetbootin, which I use a lot when preparing bootable USB stick
Code: Select all
apt-get install unetbootin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libcrypt-passwdmd5-perl syslinux syslinux-common unetbootin-translations
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libcrypt-passwdmd5-perl syslinux syslinux-common unetbootin
unetbootin-translations
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
For Chrome users
If you install the latest google-chrome-unstable you will find you have the latest "Pepper" version of Flash. And for the first time there is a native 64bit Google supplied flash.
Just remember to disable the Mint supplied flash by opening a tab and putting chrome://plugins in the address bar, then click on the plus sign on the right to expand details, then under flash you will find 2 options for flash. Select disable for the one in /usr/lib ...
Flash has been discontinued for Linux, so the version you have now is frozen forever. The only way to get new versions of flash is to use Chrome and use "Pepper".
Just remember to disable the Mint supplied flash by opening a tab and putting chrome://plugins in the address bar, then click on the plus sign on the right to expand details, then under flash you will find 2 options for flash. Select disable for the one in /usr/lib ...
Flash has been discontinued for Linux, so the version you have now is frozen forever. The only way to get new versions of flash is to use Chrome and use "Pepper".
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
And in the spirit of experimentation I tried to point the Google plugin to Chromium and Firefox and it would NOT work with either. Firefox ignored it completely. Chromium listed it as a flash player, but when I tried to play something it failed. My Chromium is several version behind Chrome Unstable, so that situation might alter when Chromium catches up.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
Post deleted (because I was being a bit thick! ).
Re: For Chrome users
There are of course the developing Gnash and Lightspark packages. But for some reason which I don't understand, they pull in a huge bundle of other, unwanted multimedia packages.GregE wrote:Flash has been discontinued for Linux
Re: For Chrome users
They both suck as well. You can have Gnash and Adobe Flash installed, just disabled one if whichever browser you use or set the default system flash using:Brian49 wrote:There are of course the developing Gnash and Lightspark packages. But for some reason which I don't understand, they pull in a huge bundle of other, unwanted multimedia packages.GregE wrote:Flash has been discontinued for Linux
update-alternatives --config flash-mozilla.so
While Flash has been discontinued, Adobe will continue to supply security patches for the next five years. So its not like it won't continue to work with Firefox or Opera.at least not until sites start requiring a newer versions.
ATM the version in Chrome and the version in Firefox are still the same.
Re: For Chrome users
They are the same version 11.2, but it looks like Google is positioning to move forward. The new Chrome plugin is PPAPI (out-of-process) instead of NPAPI and has a new name in libpepflashplayer.so - which is incompatible with libflashplayer.so. Plus, Google are supplying a native 64bit plugin for the first time.craigevil wrote:ATM the version in Chrome and the version in Firefox are still the same.
I think what will be interesting is whether or not Chromium will be able to use libpepflashplayer.so in future versions.
EDIT: I just looked on the Chromium developer site and it appears that Chromium will be able to use Pepper as well. Which IMHO is a good thing.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
Hello all,
I haven't posted in a while.
I have a couple of minor issues going.
With all the cinnamon issues I have reverted back to my failsafe xfce.
Problem number 1:
Here is a result after doing apt-get dist-upgrade
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
cinnamon python-pyquery
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Problem number 2:
When i do apt policy cinnamon I get this message:
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt policy cinnamon
-su: apt: command not found
So I try this:
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get install apt
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
apt is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
HuH?
Why is the command not found but it is installed?
I'm sure I need to read up on something going on here.
Thanks Guys
Edit 1:
Just discovered another issue:
I haven't posted in a while.
I have a couple of minor issues going.
With all the cinnamon issues I have reverted back to my failsafe xfce.
Problem number 1:
Here is a result after doing apt-get dist-upgrade
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
cinnamon python-pyquery
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Problem number 2:
When i do apt policy cinnamon I get this message:
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt policy cinnamon
-su: apt: command not found
So I try this:
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get install apt
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
apt is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
HuH?
Why is the command not found but it is installed?
I'm sure I need to read up on something going on here.
Thanks Guys
Edit 1:
Just discovered another issue:
Code: Select all
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# sudo mount -a
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get smbfs
E: Invalid operation smbfs
root@dcihon-linux-mint-debian:~# apt-get install smbfs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
smbfs : Depends: cifs-utils (= 2:5.3-2) but 2:5.4-1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
You have broken packages. apt install -f may fix that. Or you could try aptitude's more intelligent ways of solving conflicts.
Registered Linux User #528502
Feel free to correct me if I'm trying to write in Spanish, French or German.
Feel free to correct me if I'm trying to write in Spanish, French or German.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
its apt-cache policy
Post the output of inxi -Sr
From looking at
cifs-utils 2.5:3-2 is the version in Testing
while 2.5:4-1 is the version in sid
it looks like you have Testing in your sources.list, make sure to comment any Debian testing sources
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
Post the output of inxi -Sr
From looking at
Code: Select all
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
smbfs : Depends: cifs-utils (= 2:5.3-2) but 2:5.4-1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
while 2.5:4-1 is the version in sid
it looks like you have Testing in your sources.list, make sure to comment any Debian testing sources
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
This isn't exactly a breakage, but today's available upgrade to alsa-base (from 1.0.23 to 1.0.25) is being held back because it would involve removing linux-sound-base. Presumably this will get resolved as and when the corresponding upgrade to linux-sound-base becomes available.
Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - May 5th
Brian
I don't have linux-sound-base installed, is it needed? So today's update went through OK. Still got 6 packages held back (upgrade):
Cinnamon is because I am running the debs from Mockturtl.
Steve
I don't have linux-sound-base installed, is it needed? So today's update went through OK. Still got 6 packages held back (upgrade):
Code: Select all
The following packages have been kept back:
cinnamon gnome-panel gnome-panel-data libglib2.0-cil libgtk2.0-cil python-pyatspi2
Steve